Good water quality is mandatory in different phases of a successful aquaculture production, water intake, water use and waste discharges. However, unsustainable aquaculture practices can result in low yields and cause negative impacts on the environment and the human community. This review provides assessments of water quality in different aquaculture systems, and the impacts of their effluents on the natural water bodies. To optimize aquaculture production, and minimize their impacts on the environment, effective management of the water quality and wastes in aquaculture is needed. Major constraints in adequate aquaculture wastewater treatment, including high capital and operation costs of waste treatment systems, lack of incentives for waste treatment and lack of legislation and enforcement in discharges of raw aquaculture wastes, should be overcome. Possible solutions include technological innovations in production systems and wastewater treatments, increased professionals in water quality control and waste management, improved legislation, certification, financial assistance and incentives to farmers along the aquaculture industrial chains can be applied for a sustainable aquaculture sector. In Africa in general, limited knowledge of water quality is one of the main factors contributing to low production. If water quality management can be effectively carried out, it would have a great long-term impact on the aquaculture industry.
Introduction
Aquaculture is the fastest-growing food-production sector, and its sustainable growth is vital to food security, ecosystem health, uninterrupted natural resource utilization, biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic resilience. In the face of declining capture fishery resources and rising demand for fish and fishery products, aquaculture has become the main source of aquatic food/protein supply and contributes to the food security of the global population. However, there are concerns about the impacts of aquaculture activities on the environment and natural resources, such as habitat destruction, exploitation of wild fish stocks, fishmeal/fish oil requirements and waste disposal. Different aquaculture systems (extensive, semi-intensive and intensive); types of systems (closed, semi-open and open); different cultured species and stocking densities can generate different environmental impacts (Figure 1). Environmental impacts can occur through three different processes such as consumption of natural resources, culture procedures/practices and generation of wastes. Each ecosystem has its own carrying capacity, and working within the limit is crucial to avoid negative impacts. The transition of traditional cultural practices to an intensified cultural system involves increased waste that requires proper treatment to avoid pollution and deleterious impacts on the environment. With the high demand for aquaculture products, more farms are opting for intensive culture systems, which tend to affect the environment more than extensive and semi-intensive systems due to large amounts of waste containing toxins, drugs and chemicals in the former system. Thus, unsustainable aquaculture activities could result in widespread habitat destruction, loss of biodiversity, declined fishery and other aquatic resources in the surrounding area.
In aquaculture production systems, poor water quality due to accumulation of toxic compounds, including ammonia, nitrite and hydrogen sulfide, together with low dissolved oxygen, hypoxic conditions, harmful algal blooms (HABs) and pathogenic bacteria can greatly affect the fish health through bacterial infections, poor growth and stress rendering them less tolerant to handling. Diseases in aquaculture systems are closely related to the environmental health. Uncontrolled diseases can rapidly decimate operations and can cause high mortality in aquaculture systems. Lusiastuti et al. (2020) attributed the disease outbreaks, mass fish mortality and low aquaculture production to poor water quality associated with environmental degradation and climate change. Climate change can affect the aquaculture industry through flooding (too much water), drought (too little water) and changes in water quality. Decline in pH due to ocean acidification could seriously affect aquaculture, especially those in the coastal areas. Hassan et al. (2022) noted that improving water quality, maintaining stable environmental factors and controlling water exchange would reduce the occurrence of fish diseases in aquaculture production systems. Untreated or improperly treated aquaculture discharges with high nutrient concentrations can cause eutrophication and water quality deterioration, hypoxia and HABs in adjacent water bodies. HABs can be a serious concern in coastal and inland waters (rivers, lakes and reservoirs) that receive aquaculture effluents. Lukassen et al. (2019) reported that the off-flavor compounds produced by the HABs especially geosmin in tilapia produced in cage aquaculture increased the risk of decreasing fish quality and value. Hu et al. (2022) reported that Lake Datong, a shallow lake in China, became eutrophic and its water quality deteriorated after the introduction of aquaculture.
Extraction of ground water for aquaculture can cause saltwater intrusion and salinization in coastal areas. All these environmental changes could affect the livelihoods of the local communities . Kim et al. (2022) reported that an increasing number of farms in the coastal area resulted in the release of organic wastes derived from excess feed and fish metabolites. Yang et al. (2021) and Chiquito-Contreras et al. (2022) reported that approximately 27% to 49% of the feeds supplied to aquaculture production ponds are converted to fish products while the rest goes to wastes that are usually discharged into the nearbywater bodies, andeventually form one of the factors that negatively affect the aquaculture value chain.
Water treatment technologies that are technically feasible, environmentally promising and financially profitable can be integrated into different aquaculture systems to make aquaculture industry a sustainable sector and contributes to the circular economy. Aquaculture wastes can be recovered and recycled using various technologies such as bioremediation, aeration, biocoagulation and biofiltration applied in various production systems such as recirculating aquaculture system (RAS), integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) and aquaponics (aquaculture and hydroponics). In these circular economic activities, aquaculture wastes can generate additional products such as seaweeds, herbs, vegetables, mollusks and other by products,while generating a clean water source that can be recycled and used for the fed culture(Figure2). Legal instruments and authoritative interventions are also necessary for regulating aquaculture waste discharge and ensuring producers consider environmental impact and water quality management in their operations and practices. This review assessed the impacts of different production systems on the water quality and suggested possible approaches such as the use of environmentally friendly technological innovations and good governance in improving water quality management for a sustainable aquaculture industry.
Pollution and threats to water quality in aquaculture systems
Most aquaculture systems require a thorough understanding of water quality and waste management for accurate treatment decisions to ensure healthycultured organisms withhighyields. Ssekyanzi et al. (2022) reported that in SubSaharan Africa, limited knowledge of water quality is one of the main factors contributing to low production (<1% of global production) and slow growth of the aquaculture sector. Major factors contributing to the deteriorating environment and water quality in the aquaculture industry include nutrients (17%), other pollutants, including emerging pollutants (12%), habitat loss (16%), HABs (9%), lack of treatment technologies (8%) and socioeconomic factors (38%). Nutrients play a major role in eutrophication, resulting in massive proliferation of HABs, such as cyanobacteria and dinoflagellates and high mortality of cultured organisms in cultured systems (Table 1). Cyanobacterial blooms are also commonly associated with toxic–odor compounds such as geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol (2-MIB) which impart an unpleasant taste to water and cultured organisms. Marques et al. (2018) and Ryan et al. (2022) noted the negative impacts of an intensive aquaculture farm on effluent water quality due to excessive nutrients, especially phosphorus and nitrogen.
Emerging pollutants such as microplastics can cause health implications such as reduced feeding rate, gill malfunction, reduced reproductive capacity and immune suppression of cultured animals. In aquaculture, plastic debris from aquaculture farms, rafts, cages, nets and other related production structures are sources of microplastics. In addition, biofilms formed on microplastic particles are sources of pathogenic bacteria that can negatively affect aquaculture.
Contamination in water sources for aquaculture production
Availability of clean water for aquaculture is an important consideration in site selection for aquaculture operation. In fact, suitable site selection for aquaculture activities is vital to alleviate potential problems associated with pollution and conflicting activities, and to ensure that the selected water body would be a conducive growing environment without jeopardizing the existing ecosystems (Table 1). Brigolin et al. (2015) and Jayanthi et al. (2021) used remote sensing, geospatial tools and mathematical models in combination with water quality factors, environmental characteristics and socioeconomic data to identify suitable areas for cage aquaculture in estuaries and coastal areas. Vaz et al. (2021) and Arega et al. (2022) developed a habitat suitability model based on water quality, hydrodynamics and biogeochemistry for aquaculture site selection.
In aquaculture systems, pollutants can originate from both allochthonous sources (such as feeds, fertilizers and/or polluted water sources) and autochthonous sources (phytoplankton biomass, metabolites). Polluted water from rivers and coastal waters can seriously affect the health and growth of the culture species, resultinginhighmortalityandlowyields.Inclosedculturesystems such as ponds and tanks, the quality of the intake water can be controlled. Under limited circumstances, low-quality water can be first treated before use,although the production would still be lower compared to those with clean water intake. In aquaculture systems located in open waters such as lakes and coastal waters(Figure1), yields are highly dependent on the insitu water quality. In these, natural waters where cage aquaculture or extractive aquaculture is common, pollutants aremainly associated with anthropogenic activities in the catchment and upstream areas.Kim et al.(2022a) used 15-Nisotopic signatures to show that organic pollutants in estuaries and coastal areas were mainly contributed by sources related to anthropogenic activities, including organic fertilizers and aquaculture discharges exported through rivers.
To ensure the sustainability of aquaculture production through sound water quality management of open waters, Liuetal.(2023a) proposed a watershed ma na gement framework using economic based and waterquality-based protection strategies to manage catchment areas for sustainable development. To prevent nonpoint source pollution, interactions between land cover, landscape pattern and design and pollution loading should be assessed and optimized.
Factors affecting water quality in aquacultur eproduction systems
Water quality in aquaculture systems is influenced by various physical,chemical and biological factors such as temperature,light, pH, dissolved oxygen, organic matter/nutrients,microorganisms and various biological interactions.Climate change could exert drastic fluctuations in these physical chemical factors that would affect water quality, increase the incidence of fish diseases and cause high fish mortality and production. Alam et al. (2021)reported that Nile tilapia,Oreochromis niloticus, produced fewereggs under high temperatures associated with climate change,and suggested effective management strategies to overcome the lowegg productionincommercialfishhatcheries. Ocean acidification and decrease in pH caused problems in shellfish aquaculture, such as oysters.Higher sea levels could cause positive consequences such as the creation of new habitats in the coastal waters or negative impacts like saltwater intrusion.Increased windspeed and waves caused sediment suspensionand high turbidity that affectedwater quality and aquaculture activities (Shen et al., 2023).Mitigatingmeasurestoovercomeimpactsofphysicochemicalchangesincludeadaptationsinproductionsystems,goodculturestrategiessuchasspeciesdiversification,anduseofpredictive models(Table2).Abishaetal.(2022)suggested the development of climate-resilient aquaculture through adaptations to environmental factors that have negative impacts on organisms to minimize the impacts of climate change. Shenetal.(2023)used satellite remote sensing to assess the impacts of the environment and improve the ecological and environmental regulations tosupport the sustainable development of the coastal area.
High organic wastes in aquaculture systems, mainly from excess feeds and metabolites, caused water quality degradation characterized by high ammonia, nitrate and soluble reactive phosphorus, high biological oxygen demand (BOD), high chemical oxygen demand (COD) and low dissolved oxygen (Table 2). Phosphorus (P) can be a source of environmental contamination and eutrophication in aquaculture systems if not adequately removed from the wastewater. In terms of nitrogen, the proportion of toxic unionized ammonia (NH3) depends on the total ammonia concentration (ionized ammonium ion) and NH3 in the water column, which is in turn governed by water temperature and pH. Once ammonia concentrations in the water are high, fish are less able to excrete ammonia through gill diffusion resulting in the accumulation of ammonia in fish tissues, which would finally affect fish health and growth. Zhang et al. (2022) reported that toxic ammonia can reduce the quality and yield of Japanese sea perch (Lateolabrax japonicus). Due to its adverse effects on aquaculture species, ammonia concentrations in production systems should be closely monitored. Yu et al. (2021) used a hybrid soft computing method to accurately predict ammonia concentrations in aquaculture water in real time. Temperature, dissolved organic carbon and redox potential are the primary drivers of chemical fluxes in freshwater aquaculture ponds.
Accumulation of organic matter in the pond bottom can be the main cause of hypoxic conditions in enriched aquaculture ponds (Yang et al., (2021) . Under anaerobic conditions, high organic matter accumulation can produce methane (CH4), hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and nitrous oxide (N2O), which could adversely affect water quality (Table 2). Toxic H2S, commonly found in production systems with low oxygen, could cause sudden fish/shrimp mass mortality. Wu et al. (2018b) reported that CH4 and N2O fluxes in inland aquaculture ponds were positively correlated to temperature and sediment organic carbon, and negatively correlated to dissolved oxygen concentration. Chen et al. (2016) and Yang et al. (2018) noted that substantial amounts of CH4 and carbon dioxide were released from mariculture ponds. In freshwater aquaculture ponds, Zhao et al. (2021) reported that high concentrations of CH4 were released and showed that dredging of the pond bottom as part of pond preparation was more effective in reducing CH4 compared to aeration. Thus, there is a need for immediate and continuous removal of toxic compounds such as ammonia, nitrite, H2S and CH4 in aquaculture systems.
Nutrient-rich waters are also associated with cyanobacterial blooms that could produce toxic–odor compounds such as geosmin and 2-MIB, causing an unpleasant taste to water and cultured organisms. Although a variety of bacteria and fungi produce geosmin, cyanobacteria including planktonic and benthic species belonging to Nostocales, Oscillatoriales and Synechococcales are major producers of geosmin (Watson et al., Reference Watson, Monis, Baker and Giglio2016; John et al., Reference John, Koehler, Ansell, Baker, Crosbie and Jex2018). Cyanobacterial toxins pose threats and risks to human and animal health. Cyanobacteria proliferate rapidly in eutrophic waters due to their ability to float and overcome light limitations (Table 2). Geosmin has been found to cause off-flavor in a wide range of environments including RAS (Azaria and van Rijn, Reference Azaria and van Rijn2018; Lukassen et al., Reference Lukassen, Podduturi, Rohaan, Jørgensen and Nielsen2019b). Lukassen et al. (Reference Lukassen, de Jonge, Bjerregaard, Podduturi, Jørgensen, Petersen, David, da Silva and Nielsen2019a) reported that higher densities of geosmin-producing bacteria were found in the intestinal mucous layer and digestive system of tilapia (O. niloticus) compared to the water column, indicating that probiotics can be used to manage intestinal microflora to improve fish quality. Due to the detrimental impacts of HABs on aquaculture production systems, environmental and human health, and socioeconomics, microalgal toxic species distribution and abundance should be closely monitored for early detection and preventive action. In fact, reduction of the external nutrient load is the most fundamental aspect of cyanobacterial control (Kibuye et al., Reference Kibuye, Zamyadi and Wert2021). Derot et al. (Reference Derot, Yajima and Jacquet2020) used two machine learning models with a long-term base to forecast HABs. Pal et al. (Reference Pal, Yesankar, Dwivedi and Qureshi2020) suggested biological options such as bacteria, viruses, fungi and zooplankton for controlling HABs. John et al. (Reference John, Koehler, Ansell, Baker, Crosbie and Jex2018) developed a novel polymerase chain reaction method targeting the geosmin synthase gene (geoA) to assess all important sources of geosmin, while Ma et al. (Reference Ma, Wang, Li, Peng and Yang2018) showed that chlorine aqueous solution under ultraviolet light could effectively remove geosmin and 2-MIB in acidic conditions.
In addition to nutrients, aquaculture systems can also be subjected to other pollutants such as antibiotics and heavy metals that could eventually affect the quality of the produce (Table 2). Le et al. (2022) noted heavy metal pollution in the aquaculture coastal area and emphasized the need for good management practices if sustainable aquaculture is to persist in the coastal area. The use of antibiotics and chemicals in aquaculture can also have far-reaching effects on ecological food pyramids. Fernanda et al. (2022) showed that water quality parameters in aquaculture ponds were significantly correlated with the abundance of antibiotic-resistant (AR) genes which were brought down by a river polluted by various sources from the cultivated and industrial lands. In the environment, the partitioning and distribution of antibiotics are positively correlated to salinity, suspended solids, pH, ammonia and zinc, and negatively correlated to temperature, dissolved oxygen, phosphate, COD, oil, copper and cadmium. Ecological and biological risks of antibiotics are high and can be detrimental to aquaculture products. Chen et al. (2022) developed a biomarker using cyanobacterial carbonic anhydrase for monitoring antibiotics. Chemicals used in aquaculture should also be removed before discharging wastewater into the surrounding environment. Sulfonamides from aquaculture wastewater can be degraded using laccase-syringaldehyde mediator system through response surface optimization, degradation kinetics and degradation pathways. Pandey et al. (2022) suggested the removal of malachite green, which is commonly used for disease treatment in aquaculture ponds, using laccase immobilized biochar. Yanuhar et al. (2022) reported that water quality in concrete ponds can be improved by aeration, filtration and reduction of organic matter by optimizing the feed.
In addition to physical and chemical parameters, disease agents such as bacteria, fungi and other pathogenic organisms can also affect water quality and aquaculture performance (Table 2). Microbial communities in aquaculture systems are shaped by the environmental conditions which are in turn influenced by inland discharges, climate changes and anthropogenic pressures. Swathi et al. (2021) reported that water quality parameters were closely related to the outbreak of white spot disease in shrimp culture ponds. Thus, regular monitoring and estimating microbial diversity would allow farmers to link water quality parameters to subsequent fish performance and assess the environmental health of the aquaculture systems and the vicinity for early detection of microbial conditions that could lead to impaired fish health.
Water quality management in aquaculture production systems and methods to enhance it
Water quality in aquaculture production systems
Aquaculture production systems including RAS, IMTA, aquaponics (aquaculture and hydroponics) and ecosystem-based approaches were designed and constantly improved to enhance water quality and production (Table 3). These integrated production systems which have zero-water exchange and produce microorganisms as food sources, can be integrated with different types of biofiltration, biocoagulation, bioflocculation and biological interactions including bioflocs and bioremediation to enhance their wastewater treatment performance (Table 4).
Aquaponics
Aquaponics, the integration of aquaculture and hydroponics, is conceptually based on the efficient use of water and recycling of accumulated organic nutrients using plants, as one of the effective approaches in addressing the problems of aquaculture wastewater treatment, pollution in public waters, improved water quality in culture systems and sustainable aquaculture development. Essentially, aquaponics uses bacterial processes and enhances plant nutrient uptake to recover and recycle nutrients from aquaculture systems. Sopawong et al. (2023) showed that integrating fish culture and plants in a bio-green floating system significantly improved water quality, fish health and aquaculture production. In addition, aquaponics overcomes the land scarcity for aquaculture as the system can be constructed and designed to fit any area available, such as in urban areas and water-scarce areas. Palm et al. (2018) and Obirikorang et al. (2021) demonstrated the increased efficiency of aquaculture production in aquaponics improvised for commercial aquaculture production and food security. To make the aquaponics more effective, Calone et al. (2019) and Ekawati et al. (2021) combined it with RAS as aquaponic-RAS (A-RAS), which proved to be effective in improving water quality, survival rate, feed conversion ratio (FCR) and yield in catfish aquaculture (Table 3). Based on the same principle, Goddek and Körner (2019) designed RAS-hydroponic multi-loop aquaponic system for better fish and plant production with flexible sizing. Liu et al. (2019) introduced crayfish integrated system for efficient use of waste for rice production. There are different combinations of fed and extractive species in different systems to improve water quality, such as catfish, plants and bacteria in hydroponic-biofilm and NFT systems to improve biofilter and ammonia removal efficiencies. Addy et al. (2017) showed that microalgae were more efficient in ammonia removal compared to plants in aquaponic co-cultivation. Other technologies such as biochar-supplemented planting panel system, polylactic acid addition and smart sensing systems have been integrated into the design of aquaponics to improve water quality (Table 3).
Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture
The concept of IMTA utilizes complementary aquaculture species along the food chain in the process of eating and being eaten such that wastes are fully recycled and minimal pollutants are released to the adjacent waters. In IMTA system, commercially important fed species (the main fish or invertebrates that consume given feeds) are cultured together with commercially important extractive species (aquatic species such as seaweeds or mollusks that feed/use the waste of other species) so that ecological balance and water quality in the system could be maintained (Figure 3). Since feeding is an important factor in an IMTA system, Flickinger et al. (2020) showed that feed management is important to determine the water quality that translates into prawn and fish production in IMTA.
The selection of the species from various trophic is based on their physiological and ecology functions to ensure a complete recycling of organic matter in the system with minimal wastes and good water quality, which contributes to the sustainability of the aquaculture industry. Largo et al. (2016) reported the use of abalone (donkey’s ear, Haliotis asinina) as fed species and seaweeds (Gracilaria heteroclada and Eucheuma denticulatum) as the inorganic nutrient extractive species. Seaweeds functioned effectively in sequestering nutrients in various fish and shellfish cultures to minimize the impacts of pollution and improve water quality not only in aquaculture systems, but also in the related water bodies. Kelp (Macrocystis pyifera) farms in a macroalgae-based IMTA were used to sequester nitrogenous compounds from salmon aquaculture effluents resulting in low chlorophyll concentrations and improved water quality. In freshwater IMTA, Paolacci et al. (2022) showed that duckweed, Lemna spp., could substantially remove total nitrogen and total phosphorus, maintain good water quality and increase aquaculture yields. In addition to macroalgae, microalgae can be introduced in IMTA in the form of periphyton and/or microalgae–bacterial consortia to reduce nutrients and other pollutants, improve water quality and produce algal biomass for enhancement of culture yields in the system.
Recirculating aquaculture system
The RAS is a closed-circuit high-density aquatic animal farming where water from fish tanks is recirculated to remove solid and liquid wastes, and the purified water is returned to the aquaculture tanks. It is designed to provide a more controlled aquaculture system to reduce water usage and produce less wastes (both liquid and solid wastes), and thus it is more efficient and economical compared to the conventional flow-through and cage aquaculture systems. In RAS, the relative water renewal rate can be optimized, the fish FCR decreased and the growth rate increased. As excess and poor-quality feeds can cause water quality problems in RAS, Kamali et al. (2022) took into account the effects of feeding regimes on the accumulation of ammonia and dissolved oxygen in designing a new RAS to enhance the sustainability of aquaculture.
The efficiency of RAS in water quality management could be enhanced by combining the system with other functional components such as depuration system to eliminate off-flavor, microalgae system to enhance nutrient removal and bacterial communities as in simultaneous partial nitrification, anammox and denitrification system to enhance organic–inorganic matter recycling. Biofiltration in RAS functions to convert ammonia to the less toxic form, nitrate. According to Santos et al. (2022), nitrate is about 100–200 folds less toxic.
Other alternative methods of nutrient removal such as direct or indirect oxidation, adsorption by zeolites and activated carbon, air stripping and reverse osmosis have their own drawbacks in terms of low efficiency and high energy costs. Yogev et al. (2020) showed that P from RAS can be efficiently (>99%) removed through biomineralization in an anaerobic reactor and reused as fertilizer. For other toxic compounds, Bergstedt et al. (2022) proposed the use of hydrogen peroxide to remove H2S from a saltwater RAS. RAS is advantageous in areas with limited land and water. In countries with severe water shortages, such as Gulf Cooperation Council countries, RAS is useful for recycling wastewater to overcome water scarcity for aquaculture.
Integration of production systems using ecosystem-based approaches for water quality improvement
In most aquaculture systems, toxic compounds such as ammonia, nitrite and H2S can deteriorate water quality, increase mortality and reduce yields. Although Aquaponics, IMTA and RAS have been designed individually to improve water quality and increase yields, integration of these production system could increase the efficiencies and performances of aquaculture systems. Integration of A-RAS (Aquaponics and RAS), and I-RAS (IMTA and RAS), supported by a variety of functional biological components such as bacteria and microalgae can make aquaculture production systems more productive, cost-effective and efficient with less water consumption and lower disease risks.
Essentially aquaponics, IMTA, RAS and their combinations (A-RAS, I-RAS) are conceptually based on ecosystem-based approaches, where holistic integration and management of different ecosystem components are essential to maintain its ecological resilience and stability to ensure optimum production in closed aquaculture systems. However, ecosystem-based aquaculture system can also be carried out in the open system such as the integration of aquaculture and mangrove forest management in eco-green approach.
Methods for water quality enhancement
Different technologies (such as bioremediation, bio-floc and internet-of-things [IoT]) and processes (chemical reactions, filtrations, coagulations and flocculations) can be imbedded in closed aquaculture systems such as aquaponics and RAS, or open systems such as coastal waters to make the wastewater treatment and recycling more efficient, which in turns, improve water quality and enhance aquaculture yields. Liu et al. (2021) integrated heterotrophic biofloc and nitrifying biofloc filters to simultaneously control ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, soluble reactive phosphorus and alkalinity with relevant functional microbes such as ammonia and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria, denitrifying bacteria, phosphorus accumulating organisms (PAOs), denitrifying PAOs and glycogen accumulating bacteria.
Bioremediation
Bioremediation involves the use of environmentally friendly microorganisms to mitigate pollution, improve water quality and maintain ecological health in aquaculture systems. These bioremediation bacteria function to decompose organic wastes into useful inorganic compounds that are recycled to maintain a healthy nutrient cycle in various culture systems. Bioremediation minimizes the use of antibiotics and drugs and thus, decreases the detrimental consequences of routinely used chemotherapeutic agents and produces safe aquatic products for human consumption. In addition, these environmentally friendly bacteria help to improve the health conditions of cultured organisms by protecting them against infectious diseases, delivering antigens and providing several other health benefits in aquaculture.
Physical–chemical methods
Physical and chemical methods such as filtrations, coagulation, flocculation and adsorption function to remove contaminants from the aquaculture wastewater, while electrochemical oxidation breakdown persistent organic compounds and aeration increased the dissolved oxygen in the water. These methods can be applied singly or in combination in various aquaculture systems to further increase the efficiency of water quality improvement and enhance aquaculture production. Biofilters (media with attached microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, algae and protozoans) and membrane filters remove contaminants as the wastewater flows through them. Coagulation (clumping of particles), flocculation (settling of coagulated materials) and adsorption (adhering of substances) can effectively remove suspended and dissolved solids from the aquaculture wastewater . Yanuhar et al. (2022) reported that water quality in concrete ponds can be improved by aeration, filtration and reduction of organic matter by optimizing the feed. Different types of biofiltration, biocoagulation, bioflocculation and biological interactions can be selected to enhance wastewater treatment and performance in aquaculture systems depending on their functionality and costs.
IoT technologies and models
Traditionally, water quality monitoring in aquaculture systems needs manual sampling that requires a lot of time and cost. With the advent of technologies, real-time monitoring and early warning systems based on the IoT and intelligent monitoring system (IMS) can be designed and developed to make water quality monitoring and management more efficient and effective. IoT, consisting of collective network of communication devices integrated with artificial intelligence (AI) and modeling, can improve the monitoring and management of essential water quality parameters such as dissolved oxygen, pH values, turbidity and temperature in an aquaculture system. Wireless sensor network has been used widely for water quality monitoring. Rana et al. (2021) used the machine learning approach to assess the influence of water quality parameters on the growth performance of freshwater aquaculture. Rahman et al. (2021) developed an integrated framework for aquaculture prawn farm management using sensors, machine learning and augmented reality-based visualization methods through real-time interactive interfaces. Thus, models for accurate predictions of water quality parameters, such as the hybrid prediction model and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, can be developed for improved water quality management. Caballero and Navarro (2021) and Oiry and Barillé (2021) used the sentinel-2 satellite to monitor water quality, cyanoHAB and microphytobenthos. Xiang et al. (2023) used satellite remote sensing to monitor water color and water transparency, in relation to land-based activities that cause water turbidity and an increase of pollutants in aquatic ecosystems.
Policy and regulation
Policies and regulations are important in ensuring the implementation of aquaculture effluent management strategies as rapid expansion in the aquaculture industry not only provides economic opportunities but also presents risks to the environment and human society. In their assessment of sustainable global aquaculture Davies et al. (2019) noted that many countries with active aquaculture sectors have some level of governance but lack clear frameworks for sustainable aquaculture development. Bohnes et al. (2022) proposed a stepwise framework to assess the environmental impacts of aquaculture industries taking into account the existing national policy coupled with economic equilibrium models and life cycle assessment of aquaculture activities, especially those related to aquaculture feed production and usage.
Conclusions
Water quality is one of the critical factors to be considered in aquaculture as it has significant effects on fish growth, health and yields. A lack of knowledge and practices in water quality management could severely impede the growth of the aquaculture sector and jeopardize the utilization of the available water resources for a sustainable aquaculture industry.
Aquaculture requires a significant understanding of the factors and problems affecting production systems, in addition to improvements of approaches and technologies in water quality management. Water quality enhancement in production systems such as RAS, IMTA and aquaponics through efficient integration with physical, chemical and biological factors would boost the FCR and improve the health of cultured animals. The recycling of nutrients using different organisms along the aquatic food chain, such as bacteria, microalgae, seaweeds and fish, can enhance the growth, survival and production of the cultured species as well as accumulate the biomass of the supporting organisms. In addition, microalgae-based technologies are a promising solution for aquaculture wastewater treatment and the resulting microalgal biomass can be valorized. The use of these technologies in the forms of biofloc, bioremediation, coagulation-flocculation-biofiltration technologies and various ecosystem-based approaches provide options for aquaculture best practices that could improve water quality, resulting in improved aquaculture production.
The application of Artificial Intelligence and IoT in aquaculture production systems supported by sensors, wireless transmission systems, unmanned equipment, automation and big data would enable intelligent water quality monitoring, precision feeding systems, fish activity monitoring and early problem detection. The integration of smart production systems and advanced processes would result in precision feeding, improved water quality, increased survival rates and increased growth of the cultured species. Overall, the use of these technologies in water quality management supported by relevant policy and regulation would facilitate the approach to sustainable aquaculture production via effective management of the environment and fish health.
Source : Yusoff FM, Umi WAD, Ramli NM, Harun R. Water quality management in aquaculture. Cambridge Prisms: Water. 2024;2:e8. doi:10.1017/wat.2024.6
